VM and performance (was Re: [Beowulf] best Linux distribution)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Cutts tjrc at sanger.ac.ukTue Oct 9 08:46:35 PDT 2007
- Previous message: VM and performance (was Re: [Beowulf] best Linux distribution)
- Next message: VM and performance (was Re: [Beowulf] best Linux distribution)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9 Oct 2007, at 3:48 pm, andrew holway wrote: > Seems to be some excitement in Europe over Xen, a > paravirtualisation package. I ran our bioinformatics benchmark suite on some of our old RLX blades running Xen, just to see what the performance hit was. It was only about 2%, running a mixture of BLAST, HMMER, genewise and exonerate, many of which are fairly I/O intensive. I was quite surprised it was as small a hit as that. That said, I'm still not using virtualisation on our production clusters. Tim -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
- Previous message: VM and performance (was Re: [Beowulf] best Linux distribution)
- Next message: VM and performance (was Re: [Beowulf] best Linux distribution)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
