[Beowulf] best linux distribution
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mike Davis jmdavis1 at vcu.eduMon Oct 8 12:20:18 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Next message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Buccaneer for Hire. wrote: > > You should use what works best for you. > > But, building software on RHEL/CentOS is way more > difficult for the most part than building software > under Fedora. That's the difference between ~1200 > programs and thousands of programs in a distro. > It might be a problem with rpm's here as well. But I build most of our scientific software (with only a couple of exceptions) from source. So my g03, vasp, Atlas, fftw2, fftw3, gamess, lammps, mpich-1.2.7 (intel and PGI), mpich2 (intel and PGI), mrbayes, openmpi (intel and PGI), MX, deMon, NRLMOL are all source builds. With the exception of VASP (which required tweaking of MPI and compilers) all were straight forward. Non source builds are abaqus and adf, currently. Mike
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Next message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
