[Beowulf] best linux distribution
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comMon Oct 8 10:21:21 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Next message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >> > up-to-date. from a quick glance at the SL-5.0 readme, the number > of customizations is quite small, so I do wonder what the point is. > (_not_ meant as a criticism!). SL exists to populate the huge data centres at CERN and Fermilab, and as a consequence many, many HEP groups have adopted it. The point is similar to CentOS - the bottom line cost. However, there have been discussions on the SL list about future releases, and having SL as an 'overlay' on top of CentOS, ie. an additional set of repositories with the Fermilab/CERN needd packages (for instance AFS support, Castor, Cernlibs...) I don't claim to know what stage these have reached, or if there is any seriousness in this.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Next message: [Beowulf] best linux distribution
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
