[Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comTue Oct 2 14:16:00 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:52:21PM -0400, Larry Stewart wrote: > On the other hand, here's a fellow who got a 4X speedup by going to hybrid: > > www.nersc.gov/nusers/services/training/classes/NUG/Jun04/NUG2004_yhe_hybrid.ppt It's always hard to evaluate how real such claims are. But I will note that this guy is on an IBM SP, which for a while (dunno if it's fixed now) had some really horribly slow MPI library code for in-box communications. Code so bad that it made OpenMP and hybrid programming look good. He also claims MM5 gets a win with hybrid programming, but the numbers I've seen say that pure MPI is best on that code. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Naive question: mpi-parallel program in multicore CPUs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
