[Beowulf] Better C2D or Quadcore
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduWed Nov 28 15:44:33 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Better C2D or Quadcore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Better C2D or Quadcore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Samuel wrote: > PGI 7.1-1 : pgcc -mp -fastsse -tp barcelona-64,k8-64 -Mipa=fast -o > stream ./stream.c I have found that PGI does great on dynamic arrays, but poorly on static. Alas the inverse is true for pathscale, great on static arrays but poorly on dynamic. A 2.0 barcelona compiled with pathcc -O3 -mp: Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time Copy: 15314.6654 0.0084 0.0084 0.0084 Scale: 15239.8919 0.0084 0.0084 0.0084 Add: 14763.5318 0.0130 0.0130 0.0131 Triad: 14949.9019 0.0129 0.0128 0.0129 > > Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time > Copy: 12261.7219 0.1044 0.1044 0.1045 > Scale: 12284.4198 0.1042 0.1042 0.1043 > Add: 12213.4179 0.1574 0.1572 0.1581 > Triad: 11875.6082 0.1619 0.1617 0.1621 > > Intel v10 : icc -static-intel -openmp -O5 -o stream-icc stream.c > > Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time > Copy: 12214.5757 0.1048 0.1048 0.1050 > Scale: 12155.7238 0.1054 0.1053 0.1055 > Add: 12243.4062 0.1569 0.1568 0.1570 > Triad: 12240.2984 0.1569 0.1569 0.1570 > > cheers, > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Better C2D or Quadcore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Better C2D or Quadcore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
