[Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comWed Nov 28 07:37:45 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Next message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For the sake of others as easily confused as myself, I note (now, thanks!) that OpenMP and OpenMPI are two different things: OpenMP (an alternative to the MPI method) is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMP OpenMPI (an implementation of MPI) is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMPI Cool. Peter On Nov 28, 2007 8:49 AM, Charlie Peck <charliep at cs.earlham.edu> wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Jeffrey B. Layton wrote: > > > If you don't want to pay money for an MPI, then go with Open-MPI. > > It too can run on various networks without recompiling. Plus it's > > open-source. > > Unless you are using a gigabit ethernet, Open-MPI is noticeably less > efficient that LAM-MPI over that fabric. > > I suspect at some point in the future gige will catch-up but for now > my (limited) understanding is that the Open-MPI folks are focusing > their time on higher bandwidth/lower latency fabrics than gige. > > charlie > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20071128/a5032952/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Next message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
