[Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Charlie Peck charliep at cs.earlham.eduWed Nov 28 04:53:00 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Next message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Nov 28, 2007, at 12:31 AM, amjad ali wrote: > Hello, > > Because today the clusters with multicore nodes are quite common > and the cores within a node share memory. > > Which Implementations of MPI (no matter commercial or free), make > automatic and efficient use of shared memory for message passing > within a node. (means which MPI librarries auomatically communicate > over shared memory instead of interconnect on the same node). Our fairly basic tests showed that LAM-MPI is measurably more efficient than other MPI implementations when the architecture includes a mix of both intra-node and inter-node communication paths. The tests were all done over gigabit ethernet. charlie
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Next message: [Beowulf] Really efficient MPIs??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
