[Beowulf] Teaching Scientific Computation (looking fo the perfect text)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N dnlombar at ichips.intel.comMon Nov 26 07:37:49 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Teaching Scientific Computation (looking fo the perfect text)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Software RAID?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:23:32PM -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, David Mathog wrote: > > >It would have been interesting if C++ had implemented operator > >definition instead of operator overloading (ie, redefinition). > >For instance like: > > > >A = B + C <VecX> D > > > > (one or two last ones while I clear mail:-). Actually a really, really > interesting idea, but one does have a whole new class of typing errors. ... > > But it still is a really good idea. There is a generalized algebra of > dyad, triad, inner and outer products, and so on. APL does provide generalized inner and outer products. But, it is a write-once language, and attempts to outperform the interpreter, such as compilers or even an "APL machine" did not do as well. -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Teaching Scientific Computation (looking fo the perfect text)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Software RAID?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
