[Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 45, Issue 28
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Nov 22 22:35:40 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 45, Issue 28
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question about list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> We did play with the Pathscale compilers once but the license server > they used caused us too much of a user support pain as it binds > licenses to a user for a period after the compiler has been used. they've basically fixed that by reducing the timeout. the initial timeout appears to have been modeled on an organization with full-time developers, who would actually keep using the compiler frequently for most of a working day. thus the number of licenses would correspond sensibly to the number of developer seats. this makes no sense in an academic cluster environment, of course, where it's very rare for a user to spend a long, solid time recompiling. the current timeouts work very well for us. (if there's interest, I can grep some usage stats.) > If they swap to FlexLM we may revisit that. I hope not. flexlm isn't terrible, but it's certainly no better than Pathscale's license server or other RYO LS's like Allinea. regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 45, Issue 28
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question about list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
