[Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgSat Nov 10 22:18:06 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007, Buccaneer for Hire. wrote: > A stock kernel will from Redhat will not give you the performance > you need. Indeed, and the people I know at Red Hat in Australia are well aware of my thoughts on their restrictive choice of filesystems.. :-) cheers! Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20071111/c5fc815d/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network Filesystems performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
