[Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kilian CAVALOTTI kilian at stanford.eduFri Nov 9 10:11:46 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Vincent, On Friday 09 November 2007 09:21:41 am Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > Ok easy theoretic calculation, and it's still very rude of course: > > 1 core 2.4Ghz * 3 instructions a cycle * (sse)2 = 7.2 * 2 = 14.4 > Gflop Could you please elaborate a little bit about the "3 instructions a cycle * (sse)2" part? I thought Intel's quad-core line was able to do 4 ops/cycle, but you're talking about 6, which makes a huge difference in the final numbers. For instance, theoretical performance using one core of a E5345 (Clovertown 2.33GHz) would be 9.32 GFlops considering 4 ops/cycle, and 13.98 GFlops if we consider 6 ops/cyle. Given that the actual measured HPL performance on one core is about 7.86 GFlops, it would give an efficiency of a mere 56%, which would badly sucks (a 84% efficency is more in the line of reasonnable values to me, for one single core). But I may have missed something. Cheers, -- Kilian
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
