[Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at caltech.eduThu Nov 8 12:54:29 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] encoding video cluster style.
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote: > It's actually a VIA C7-D. Way worse than a Celery in absolute performance, > but might be okayish to stellar in terms of Ops/Joule. To expand on the stellar part slightly, if the proposed cluster is to be powered on all the time, but won't be in use all the time, it's worth noting that the C7 has very low power modes which are still running, albeit very slowly. This would make such a cluster quite responsive in terms of starting jobs from the "just sitting around" state, without requiring any of the complications, overhead, and longish delays associated with returning from sleep modes. In theory the kernel should handle this power conservation for you automatically if the cpufreq modules are installed and configured properly. The power consumption when the system is sitting around would be minimal, probably just a few watts. This assumes that the board in question actually supports these low power modes. This is probably NOT a safe assumption for an el cheopo board. Regards, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] encoding video cluster style.
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Walmart Compute Node?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
