[Beowulf] Quick question... on Fortran
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduThu May 10 14:57:55 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Quick question... on Fortran
- Next message: [Beowulf] Quick question... on Fortran
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:37:58PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
>
>> Who knows, in ten years we may see a merge of fortran and c into a
>> "supercompiler" that permits near transparent switching of syntax, or
>> inlining of fortran in c the way assembler can be inlined now.
>
> Existing compilers do inline Fortran into C, it's needed for some of
> the SPEC benchmarks which mix C with Fortran77 numerical routines.
>
> I don't see much point in having both languages in the same source
> file.
Me neither, actually. Although there might be some point in developing
a new language that smoothly merges the desireable features of both.
(He ducks and runs for cover, just KNOWING that 80 people are about to
announce that C++, python, matlab, pascal, f95, c99, already do...;-)
rgb
--
Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Quick question... on Fortran
- Next message: [Beowulf] Quick question... on Fortran
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
