[Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue Mar 27 16:35:37 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Kjellstrom wrote: >> also, I'm sorta amazed people keep selling (and presumably buying) >> dual-port IB cards. doesn't that get quite expensive, switch-wise? > > Not defending them but, It could possibly maybe be useful if you have a > stand-alone IB net for, say, storage or something else not mpi. Also, it's > not like they're that much more expensive than single port ones... They aren't terrible. The dual port cards can be good for multi-path to IB connected storage. Similar to multi-connected FC, but a bit faster. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
