[Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comTue Mar 27 09:28:53 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:54:58PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote: > or is this an example of message aggregation? The message aggregation number is said to be run with MVAPICH 0.9.9; message aggregation is in that version, and can't be disabled. > also, I'm sorta amazed people keep selling (and presumably buying) > dual-port IB cards. doesn't that get quite expensive, switch-wise? HPC customers don't buy them. Enterprise customers want to know that they exist, but then they don't buy them, either. Eventually IB will be like Fibre Channel and enterprise customers will actually buy dual-port cards. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
