[Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 37, Issue 58
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Håkon Bugge Hakon.Bugge at scali.comMon Mar 26 02:38:32 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] May I ask you about memtest test pattern?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 37, Issue 58
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Christian, At 01:19 24.03.2007, beowulf-request at beowulf.org wrote: >I've yet to see a significant number of message-passing applications >show that an RDMA offload engine, as opposed to any other messaging >engine, is a stronger performance determinant. That's probably >because there are other equally important and desirable features >implemented in other messaging engines. I find this statement hard to justify from available benchmark data. Looking at the LS-DYNA neon_refined_revised submissions to www.topcrunch.org, you can add one in favour of RDMA ;-). Scali MPI Connect, utilizing SDR IB, performs better than all comparable systems, except for one case, where Infinipath is faster. This is somewhat surprising to me, given the latency and message rate advantage Infinipath has compared to traditional IB. Therefore, let me use this opportunity to stress that its not only the interconnect architecture, but also the software harnessing it (read MPI) that matters. Would be nice though, to evaluate the combination of Infinipath and Scali MPI Connect on this case. Thanks, Håkon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] May I ask you about memtest test pattern?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 37, Issue 58
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
