[Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comMon Mar 19 18:05:01 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 08:02:40PM -0400, Joe Landman wrote: > The issue (last I looked last year) with GSL was parallelism. There was > an OpenMP "port" attempt at one time. No MPI-er-ization (is there a > reasonable word to describe the process of converting to MPI?) Then you should be sticking with BLAS, ATLAS, Scalapack, etc. I can't believe the GSL people invented a new interface for the one numerical interface which is now universal. Not to mention that they ignored lots of faster, free libraries like ATLAS and FFTW... what's the point of reinventing the wheel badly? -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
