[Beowulf] Berkeley View: A future in Parallel Programming?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caSat Mar 17 19:59:20 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Berkeley View: A future in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Just so that I'm clear on the wording: > Multicore: Today's dual and quad cores. > Manycore: many, many more cores per die [like Intel's recent prototype] I think the distinction is more than just cores-per-die, but rather that VFB's authors coin manycore as the approach which embraces all their hot-buttons (low-power, fairly dumb cores, lots of them, no coherency among them, some kind of virtualization, thin OS's, autotuning, etc.) > If that is true, where does the Cell BE fit? Multi or Many? cell-BE is a PPC with some attached processors. it's not that much different from a cpu+gpu (not surprising, considering its market.)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Berkeley View: A future in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
