[Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comThu Mar 15 22:03:06 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:14:06PM -0500, Peter St. John wrote: > I'd be optimistic for the process of translating F to C, followed by > compiling the C, to be as effecient as the process of compiling C into > assembler, followed by assmbling into executable. I'm not optimistic. The process destroys info. It's not that Fortran compilers are better at optimizing... most Fortran compilers are also C compilers. It's that Fortran as a language is easier to optimize, and Fortran programmers tend to write easier to optimize programs (more arrays, less pointers.) When you translate to C, automatic or not, you usually lose both properties. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
