[Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tom Mitchell mitch48 at sbcglobal.netWed Mar 14 15:30:35 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 01:40:42PM -0700, Bill Broadley wrote: > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435 > Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org > > Renato S. Silva wrote: > >Hi > > > >What is the best compiler for AMD processors ? Bill is exactly correct... the answer depends on you code. I have a bias to the PathScale compiler (available from QLogic, see www.pathscale.com) but some constructs are handled better by one compiler and not so well by other compilers. So benchmark your code and see what happens. Sometimes the important issue is code that is clean and standards compliant (thus portable and bug free). Working with a pair of quality compilers at the same time during development can help in this goal. It also, turns out that clean and standards compliant code tends to run faster more often than not. You might also look at Spec (www.spec.org) results for various AMD processor based systems to see what compiler hardware vendors found to be the best.... The footnotes are interesting. > >Thanks > >Renato > > At? > > For which language (java, c, c++, f90, or ???) -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new place to hang my hat :-) Now it got bought.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
