[Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govTue Mar 13 15:46:38 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 02:58 PM 3/13/2007, Joe Landman wrote: >>Pointers? Anathema! I'll bet you even do things like topological >>sorts and other stuff out of Knuth, instead of nice clean matrix >>math. If you don't know how big your arrays are and how many you >>need before you start, then you don't understand your problem well >>enough. Dynamic allocation is a sign of weak will, or worse. > >Egad man... have you not heard of the abuses of the fortran >equivalence statement? heard of them? I've used them! And it's only abuse if you don't know what you're doing. passed down to me as secrets of the guild. Named COMMON too. And what of overlay loaders that actually depended on such stuff to pass data from one overlay to the next. (this brings up all sorts of interesting memories from 30 years ago) >>We are piling the wood for the auto da fe right now... > >Ah... humor .... indeed...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A start in Parallel Programming?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
