[Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.comMon Mar 12 13:09:18 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 03:16:43PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: > >> I don't disagree, although even their earliest pictures had more than >> just CPU and memory hanging off the network. As in CPU, memory, a PCI >> bus and several direct attached devices were on most of the >> transparencies that I recall of AMD's roadmap presentation 2-3 years >> ago. > > We were around 2-3 years ago. But think: what on a typical motherboard > could be moved to HT that isn't aready there? Raid controller? gigE? > No, both of these find PCIe plenty fast. It's only exceptional devices > (video, high speed interconnect, coherant interconnect) that get a > benefit. > > Personally I've been kind of surprised that the video guys haven't > attached directly to HT. nVidia could have put their graphics chip in > their HT/PCIe bridge. I bet there's some economic reason that drives > it. Because the unit volume that makes the parts profitable to fab is consumers putting $600 video-cards in $1000 pc's. Doing a one off for say a quadro 45xx variant (card that would retail for $5000) probably doesn't make sense... 40Gb/s is fast enough for their purposes right now... keeping the 128 stream processors in an 8800gtx fed is taking ~690Gb/s which is well outside what you can pull across a port you can find on a processor or north bridge anyway. >> You might want to edit the widipedia page on this, as it states >> "Hypertransport has largely fallen out of favor with the networking >> community, in favor of SPI 4.2 and PCI-Express" which definitely implies >> that at one time it was IN favor...:-) > > That's referring to the network community, as in ethernet switches. > There's a reason why SiByte and PMC Sierra and other folks have HT on > their non-x86 cpus. 10Gb/s ethernet is now being driven by the commodity space. pci-e 4x and 8x slots are adequate attachment points for 10Gb cards. The motivation for anything else is limited. > -- greg > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
