[Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kozin, I (Igor) i.kozin at dl.ac.ukThu Mar 8 09:43:21 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> So, yes, clock-for-clock (and for my usage) Xeon 51xxs are > faster than > Opterons. But, if your code hits memory *really hard* (which > that heart > model does), then the multiple paths to memory available to > the Opterons > allow them to scale better. Yes, and this is consistent with stream numbers we were discussing a while ago. Enabling cache snoop filter can pump up stream numbers considerably but unfortunately I find its effect on application performance to be erratic: from -10% to +4%. If the original poster goes for Xeon I'd suggest considering to pay a little premium (20 pounds) and upgrade to 667 MHz FB DIMMs.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Next message: [Beowulf] Benchmark between Dell Poweredge 1950 And 1435
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
