[Beowulf] network filesystem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jaime Perea jaime.perea at gmail.comWed Mar 7 05:08:39 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] [PCGrid 2007] call for participation: workshop on desktop grids
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
Well, it seems that this is a hot topic. I'm impressed for
the quality of the answers!
I think that since the disk server machine is not yet installed
it will be useful to do a few tests in advance.
My idea was to put this filesystem as /home, so there is going
to be a lot of traffic of small files. I tend to think that for doing
parallel intensive work it is better to use a distributed fs such
as pvfs2.
I did the question to the list because I imagined that one can
take advantage of things like local cache for the gfs and ocfs2
cases. We have been smoothly working with gfs but with a
two node and a FC san configuration. We also tested ocfs2
exporting a device via AoE (vblade) in a 3 node configuration,
and I like the results (and much easier configuration btw)
But when going to 16 nodes things can change a lot!, perhaps
in that case nfs4 is the best solution (apart from being much
easier to configure and maintain) .
Thanks a lot!
--
Jaime D. Perea Duarte. <jaime at iaa dot es>
Linux registered user #10472
Dep. Astrofisica Extragalactica.
Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC)
Apdo. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] [PCGrid 2007] call for participation: workshop on desktop grids
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
