[Beowulf] network filesystem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert Latham robl at mcs.anl.govTue Mar 6 07:53:41 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:08:28AM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > writing to different sections of a file is probably wrong on any > networked FS, since there will inherently be obscure interactions > with the size and alignment of the writes vs client pagecache, I'm rather surprised to see that sentiment on a mailing list for high performance clusters :> I would contend that writing to different sections of a file *must* be supported by any file system deployed on a cluster. How else would you get good performance from MPI-IO? PVFS, GPFS, and Lustre all suppoort simultaneous writes to different sections of a file. > in my experience, people who expect it to "just work" have an > incredibly naive model of how a network FS works (ie, write() > produces an RPC direct to the server) I agree that the POSIX API and consistency semantics make it difficult to achieve high I/O rates for common scientific workloads, and that NFS is probably not the best solution for those truly parallel workloads. Fortunately, there are good alternatives out there. ==rob -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF Argonne National Lab, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
