[Beowulf] network filesystem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgMon Mar 5 19:43:30 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, jaime.perea at gmail.com wrote: > I have a small (16 dual xeon machines) cluster. [...] > Does anybody knows what is better for a cluster of this size, exporting the > filesystem via NFS FWIW we run two NFS servers (dual 2.0GHz Opteron 240's) with users split across the two and they cope with 3 clusters, two with ~180 CPUs and one with ~30 CPUs, all run at an average of 83% utilisation over the last 12 months (one at around 92% utilisation for the last 3 months). So yes, NFS should be fine. Just don't try and run Gaussian on it. :-) cheers, Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/ Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070306/fedd3479/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
