[Beowulf] network filesystem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Walid walid.shaari at gmail.comMon Mar 5 07:41:58 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/5/07, Chris Samuel <csamuel at vpac.org> wrote: > > > - compound rpcs. probably provides somewhat better efficiency. > > Yup, should ease the burden of a lot stat()'s. > > > - client caching/delegation/leases - could be valuable for efficiency. > > Indeed, this to me is the most useful part of it, especially for those > people > who are running code that should use local scratch but doesn't (either due > to > lack of coding experience or not having access to the source).. Our developers had that issue of inconsistent file system view in RHEL based systems, some of it is solved by disabling dir list caching, another by using noac, what the other was doing was writing simultaneously to the same file partitioned over several nodes, I told this is probably not the right way to do file writing. apparently he used to do it in Sun Solaris and it worked flawlessly. NFSv4 brings to the table standard client implementation. unfortunately Red Hat recommends RHEL5 which should be out soon now for NFSv4 Walid. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070305/ea9feb32/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Next message: [Beowulf] network filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
