[Beowulf] IB switches: managed or not?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Robbie (GMail) andrew.robbie at gmail.comMon Mar 5 05:06:07 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] extreme dynamic underclocking and undervolting
- Next message: [Beowulf] IB switches: managed or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I am building a small (~16) node cluster with an IB interconnect. I need to decide whether I will buy a cheaper, dumb switch and run OpenSM, or get a more expensive switch with a built in subnet manager. The largest this system would every grow is 32 nodes (two 24 port switches). Various vendors (integrators, not switch OEMs) have stated to me that managed switches are the go, and that OpenSM is (a) buggy, and (b) very time consuming to set up. But, a managed name brand switch seems to cost a lot more than a non-managed one using the Mellanox reference design kit (rebadged, but I suspect made by Flextronics...). My other query is about diagnostic software. With an ethernet switch it is pretty easy to fire up Ethereal (sorry Wireshark, but it is such a silly name) or Etherape and get a look at what is going on. If I buy a Cisco or Voltaire etc do they come with tools that let me get accurate representations of what is going on? Or are their tools really for large IB networks? Regards, Andrew [v2] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070306/c28ef7d0/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] extreme dynamic underclocking and undervolting
- Next message: [Beowulf] IB switches: managed or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
