[Beowulf] Companies contributing to the Linux kernel
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comFri Mar 2 12:09:06 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Load Balance Shifts During Run of Fixed Balance Application
- Next message: [Beowulf] Companies contributing to the Linux kernel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LWN recently did an article entitled "Who wrote 2.6.20?" It was a reponse to a Time magazine article which claimed that Linux was written by volunteers, when most of us know that most Linux kernel development is done by paid developers. http://lwn.net/Articles/222773/ In one of the charts he looked at all the changes to the kernel in the last year, and summed them up by company. The top companies were (drumroll please): (Unknown) 740990 29.5% Red Hat 361539 14.4% (None) 239888 9.6% IBM 200473 8.0% QLogic 91834 3.7% Novell 91594 3.6% Intel 78041 3.1% ... and we didn't even do our own distro! Hee hee. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Load Balance Shifts During Run of Fixed Balance Application
- Next message: [Beowulf] Companies contributing to the Linux kernel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
