[Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comFri Jun 15 12:16:38 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:57:08AM -0400, Joe Landman wrote: > First, shared memory is nice and simple as a programming model. Uhuh. You know, there are some studies going where students learning parallel programming do the same algorithm with MPI and with shared memory. Would you like to make a bet as to whether they found shared memory much easier? > In the implementation, it > might be taught about multi-core, and optimizing communication within > boxes via shm sockets, and between boxes by other methods. I think a > few of the MPI toolkits do this today (Scali, Intel, OpenMPI, ...). "a few" should be "almost all". -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
