[Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at fft.beFri Jun 15 06:53:23 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Interesting" because I found it a very enlightened argument/POV in this whole multi-core frenzy. I _certainly_ do not disagree, I do not know yet if I totally agree (see my mail on BLACS and GotoBLAS in this same thread). My mail was actually not really intended for the whole beowulf-ml. I just found it shocking revealing and I think many multi-thread advocates would have a hard-time responding to such a clear statement. t Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:17:16PM +0200, Toon Knapen wrote: > >> Because of everybody going multi-core, everybody is pushing to go >> multi-threading to exploit these architectures (e.g. the gaming-world >> and many more). IIUC you're saying that MPI might better exploit these >> architectures? Interesting POV! > > Why "interesting"? Do you disagree that message-passing is the way to > go, since shared memory doesn't scale? >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
