[Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comThu Jun 14 20:33:15 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:04:59PM -0700, Joseph Han wrote: > Is running a program using OpenMP on a SMP/multi-core box more efficient that > an MPI code with an implementation using localhost optimization? One good example comes from codes which have both pure MPI and hybrid MPI/OpenMPI implementations. There's published data from John Michalakes MM5 is faster in pure MPI mode. In fact I've never seen a bid involving pure MPI and hybrid codes where hybrid was faster. There are some unsual cases where hybrid can be a win: * Codes with extreme load imbalance, like NASA's CFD code Overflow. But it's hare to tell what a good MPI implementation of Overflow would perform like; if it turns out that it's simply unusually OpenMP friendly, that's not really a useful datapoint. * Codes where a pure MPI code runs out of decomposition, but the hyrbrid code doesn't. * Codes where there's a big read-only database that can be shared within a node. But you can share between MPI processes using Sys5 shared memory segments, or you can mmap the database as a file, which shares it. Hybrid can be a lose when MPI interconnect hardware benefits from being driving from multiple cores. All in all, hybrid programming has been an incredible waste of time, ranking up with HDF in the all-time failures in HPC. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: programming multicore clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
