[Beowulf] MPI performance gain with jumbo frames
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Jun 13 16:37:05 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI performance gain with jumbo frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] backtraces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:02:10PM -0400, Douglas Eadline wrote: > So this begs the question, if we are "core rich and packet small" > do we care about packet size and overhead? That's not quite the question. In many programs, there is no possible overlap between communication and computation, so they don't care how high the overhead is, although for smaller messages lower overhead can mean higher bandwidth (that "message rate" thing, again.) If you can overlap, then you do care about overhead, especially for Ethernet, where the cpu overhead is often unequally distributed over your cores. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI performance gain with jumbo frames
- Next message: [Beowulf] backtraces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
