[Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comFri Jul 20 13:29:24 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Next message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:09PM -0400, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > NTP's precision is good enough > for comparing log and other administration needs. I agree with this, however, there's another upcoming use of very high resolution synchronized clocks: synchronizing timer ticks across your cluster. The new "tickless" Linux infrastructure looks like it makes it fairly easy to have your clock ticks take place at roughly the same time on all your nodes, which should improve performance when you have big clusters and a lot of synchronization in your code. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Next message: [Beowulf] IEEE 1588 (PTP) - a better cluster clock?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
