[Beowulf] openMosix ending
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Forrest jlforrest at berkeley.eduTue Jul 17 08:34:32 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Next message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Galitz wrote: > The lack of kernel supported checkpointing capabilities in the linux > kernel is something that has baffled me or a while. I wonder if it > was ever submitted and then rejected? It seems a natural > fit for many organizations. Are there hardware limitations in the x86 world? I've always heard that what makes checkpoint/restart hard is having to handle asynchronous events. The Berkeley NOW project was going to do checkpoint/restart as one of their initial projects but it never happened. If I remember correctly, it turned out to be harder than they thought to do completely right. Cordially, -- Jon Forrest Unix Computing Support College of Chemistry 173 Tan Hall University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1460 510-643-1032 jlforrest at berkeley.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Next message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
