[Beowulf] openMosix ending
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tony Travis ajt at rri.sari.ac.ukTue Jul 17 08:03:16 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Next message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Jeffrey B. Layton wrote: > >> Afternoon all, >> >> I don't know how many people this affects, but I thought it was >> worth posting in case people are using openMosix. The >> leader of openMosix, Moshe Bar, has announced that the >> openMosix project is ending. >> >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=715406 >> >> While I haven't used openMosix, I've seen it used and it is >> pretty cool to see processes move around nodes. > > Yeah, but it has nearly always had a few tragic flaws. One was that it > was always basically a hack of a specific kernel version and image, > meaning that if you used it you were outside of a working kernel update > stream. The second was that it was basically a hack of a specific > kernel version and image at all, where one really would prefer a tool > that did the same thing outside of kernel space (like Condor, for > example). It survived those flaws, of course -- but it cannot survive > the advent of virtualization, which will provide new pathways for this > sort of thing to be done with far greater ease and stability. Hello, Robert. I've been using openMosix for a long time, and you're right about the kernel 'trap' it puts you into. I recently 'ported' linux-2.4.26-om1 to Ubuntu. Although I've succeeded in getting our 92-node Beowulf up and running openMosix under Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS the end of life announcement means I have to start thinking about replacing it. Do you really think that Condor is an alternative to openMosix? I don't know much about Condor, but I thought is was a DRM (Distributed Resource Manager) like SGE. Is it more than that? The great thing about openMosix is that most 'ordinary' programs migrate. I've thought about using openSSI previously: What's your opinion about that for 'embarrassingly' parallel computation? Best wishes, Tony. -- Dr. A.J.Travis, | mailto:ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk Rowett Research Institute, | http://www.rri.sari.ac.uk/~ajt Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, | phone:+44 (0)1224 712751 Aberdeen AB21 9SB, Scotland, UK. | fax:+44 (0)1224 716687
- Previous message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Next message: [Beowulf] openMosix ending
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
