[Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Jul 12 15:46:37 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Next message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> chipset(s), inefficiency in the power supply, and the memory. On thing that > surprised me a bit the last time I looked at this a year ago was that the > power use of typical memory sticks is quite high, often more than 10W. In do your systems use very large numbers of dimms? I think ours are typically 4-8. so even 8x10W is going to be comparable to a cpu or the inefficiency of a mediocre PSU. like most of these other factors, this is a situation that's improving - one of ddr3's main changes is going from 1.8 to 1.5V, saving ~30% on power. one nice thing is that dram dissipate a lot less power when fully-on but not continuously bursting (~50 mA vs 300). I don't know whether current bios/mem controllers will but dram into the really low-power modes (~7mA self-refresh) by default. > fact if you look at system with well-designed cooling, you'll see that the > fans are designed to blow a lot of air over the memory area. yes, though the power density is relatively low. I wonder if one could come up with a specific access pattern that would overheat particular chips on a dimm - perhaps even corresponding chips on a dual-rank dimm...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Next message: [Beowulf] power usage, Intel 5160 vs. AMD 2216
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
