[Beowulf] massive parallel processing application required
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Jan 31 21:37:23 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] massive parallel processing application required
- Next message: [Beowulf] massive parallel processing application, required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 02:37 PM 1/31/2007, Mark Hahn wrote: >>worked at a e-science project himself. He told me people, especially > >is this "e-science" term more popular where you are? I don't really >hear it here (Canada, probably NA in general.) many (most) branches >of science are so dependent on computers that it seems redundant and archaic. > >>scientists are "very jealous" of their data. And not replying is a >>kind way of saying "no". And there's the problem of "who's this guy >>wanting my data", "what will he do with it?". > >sure - academia is all about publishing, so you don't want someone >else to scoop you. This is an interesting aspect. All the latest Announcements of Opportunity for space research (think cameras taking pictures of Mars, or analyzing rocks etc.) have fairly fast time lines(weeks, not months or years) for relase of data to general public, and you have to put your plans and budgets for public distribution in the proposal. No more holding onto the data, "recalibrating and reprocessing", until everyone gets their dissertations done. The Dead Sea Scrolls are probably a pretty notorious example of "we're still working on it.. when we're done, we'll release it"...Amazing what a computer and a concordance can do. > but often concerns are much more mundane, like: > > - how long will it transfer this 50GB blob of data? Think terabytes, for many data sets. QuikSCAT gives you wind vectors for 90% of the world's ice free ocean twice a day on a 25 km grid. Raw radar data coming down from the spacecraft before calibration is basically 200 odd measurements/second (each measurement consisting of 10 numbers) continuously 24/7. And, that's a low volume sensor. Something like a SAR doing radar imaging is orders of magnitude greater. Sipping from a firehose indeed. > - if I provide neurophysiology data from my lab, can I > be sued if the subjects' privacy is violated? > > - do I have time to spend explaining how the data is encoded? That's a biggie... Budgets are always limited, so they tend to do just what's needed for the immediate purpose. >regards, mark hahn. >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit >http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] massive parallel processing application required
- Next message: [Beowulf] massive parallel processing application, required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
