[Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
hunting at ix.netcom.com
Thu Jan 18 21:14:38 PST 2007
At 04:41 PM 1/18/2007, Robert G. Brown wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Jim Lux wrote:
>>And likewise, WinXP on the desktop. A company with 20,000 WinXP
>>desktops cannot tolerate BSODs and mystery hangs on a significant
>>fraction of those desktops at any frequency. When your call center
>>operators are being timed to the second, the sysadmin folks know
>>INSTANTLY when there are problems.
>>But, just as in the server application, the configurations are
>>rigorously controlled and tested. It's certainly not the usual
>>home computer with umpty-five downloaded widgets, etc.
>Even with strong controls and an instantly reinstallable system image,
>WinXX boxes are corrupted once a month or so in our labs. Too many
>things that can go wrong. Fortunately, they've dropped the
>reinstallation time to almost nothing.
>>>Linux remains around the 1% level in US desktop occupancy, and even in
>>>the pacific rim where its numbers are the best it only makes it to 3% or
>>>so (the rest are doubtless mostly bootleg WinXX). The largest monopoly
>>>ever to exist in the history of the world laughs at these numbers. On
>>>the broader server market Linux fares better, but it is still very much
>>>David against Goliath where David may appear sometimes to be winning,
>>>but Goliath has yet to be hit in the head with any kind of stone.
>>More like grains of sand being dribbled about the feet.
>Well 1% of a person's height would TECHNICALLY be somewhere between 1
>and 2 cm. And in the server arena, it would be quite a bit higher.
>Say, small pebbles to just the kind of rocks one can turn an ankle
>I should have used a different metaphor, though. Microsoft so far has
>been to Linux like Fezzik was with Westley in The Princess Bride,
>tolerating its occassional blows. "I just want you to feel you're doing
>well. I have for people to die embarrassed..."
>>>Basically, MS's cluster product is almost certainly designed to do two
>>>things. One is provide them with a credible presence in the cluster
>>>market not because it is particularly important to them as a profit
>>>center but because hurting linux and the other unices strengthens their
>>>position in the general server market in many ways. They do not want
I dunno. I found print somewhere reflecting the overall HPC market
for 2007 looking like $11.4B growing at nearly 10% per year thru
2010, with departmental and workgroup clusters estimated at 6.6B.
Completely aside from putting a dent in the linux armour, I would
expect that someone within MS had a huge epiphany in terms of how
they might be able to help dice up that $6.6B. You can bet they've
been working with hundreds of significant ISV's and they'll be close
to their projected ROI, whether it's a better mousetrap or not.
>>I think it's also to support the turnkey software vendors who need
>>a platform with more compute crunch for their existing Windows
>>application. Think finite element models of one kind or
>>another. If your application costs $50K/seat, a kilobuck or two
>>for an OS isn't a big deal.
>As I said, they might want to make money, sure, and although they MIGHT
>do it at a loss if they thought it was important enough they certainly
>would rather not. I think they'll make money, but probably not a lot.
>It's almost like developing a new business, and there is plenty of
>competition even though of course they'll exploit their advantages where
>Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
>Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
>Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
>Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
>Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
>To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
More information about the Beowulf