[Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eric Shook eric-shook at uiowa.eduThu Jan 18 06:53:31 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ashley Pittman wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 08:50 +0100, Mikael Fredriksson wrote: >> Eric Shook wrote: >>> I talked to our SGI rep about this yesterday and he told me they are not >>> really targeting "hard-core" university research where Linux/UNIX >>> already has a strong foot hold. Instead this is for the Business sector >>> where simplified workflows and having easy HPC integration into an >>> already 100% Windows Infrastructure is more appealing. >>> >>> This was his take and it seemed reasonable to me. >> Yes, it is. And more so if this cluster/LAN can also utilize som type >> of "MOSIX" system. This will substatially increase the throughput of >> "standard serial" processes. > > I find this statement hard to comprehend, how can any OS substantially > improve throughput of jobs unless what it replaces is incredibly > deficient in some way? The limiting factor on clusters is the speed of > the hardware, even if some OS magically manages to be say 50% more > efficient doing it's bit than another OS it's still only a tiny percent > of time used, substantial improvements in job throughput can only come > about from better parallel algorithms, better code or faster hardware. > Actually there are a few case studies floating around comparing Linux to Windows (not sure about UNIX). That when running on identical hardware and the same code you can lose up to 30% efficiency running on Windows. I am too lazy to try to find my supporting evidence but for the last 2 years at SC05/06 there have been such studies on the show floor (I don't think they made it to the papers/posters section of the conference, so I cannot comment on the quality of the study). Eric >> But as stated in a previous thread, the "hard-core" systems are fairly specialized. > > I think you may be surprised if you actually used a hard-core system, > whilst it's true that they are more than the sum of their parts the > parts are mostly that of a bog standard Linux distribution. > > I suppose it could be true that changing to OS to Windows would make > them less specialised however that probably says more about Windows than > it does about "hard-core" clusters, I've no idea if this statement would > be true any more however, I've not used Windows in a number of years. > > Ashley, > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Eric Shook (319) 335-6714 Technical Lead, Systems and Operations - GROW http://grow.uiowa.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
