[Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.comFri Feb 16 18:19:19 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >> Failure rate vs. drive speed (RPM)? > > surely "consumer-grade" rules out 10 or 15k rpm disks; > their collection of 5400 and 7200 disks is probably skewed, > as well (since 5400's have been uncommon for a couple years.) Ictually I'd bet that's most of the 5400rpm disks would be maxtor maxline II nearline drives, netapp also used then in several filers. They were the first 300GB drive by a couple of months and came with a 5 year warranty... I have several dozen of them, and for the most part there still working though the warranties are all expiring at this point. > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: failure trends in a large disk drive population
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
