[Beowulf] Teraflop chip hints at the future
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.orgTue Feb 13 03:07:25 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Teraflop chip hints at the future
- Next message: [Beowulf] Teraflop chip hints at the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:57:04AM +0100, Alan Louis Scheinine wrote: > Cell (CBE) shows that a similar approach can run Linux, one > conventional processor and lots of specialized cores on the same chip. Yes, but it lacks the on-die switch to scalably mesh cores, so you only get a few cores for each fat (=many pins) connection to memory. This is no way to run a kNode in one physical box. Apropos of Cell, I presume most of you have seen http://moss.csc.ncsu.edu/~mueller/cluster/ps3/ Anyone knows how badly the GBit virtualization layer (hypervisor) on the PS3 hits latency on Cell Linux? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Teraflop chip hints at the future
- Next message: [Beowulf] Teraflop chip hints at the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
