[Beowulf] Help with inconsistent network performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comTue Dec 18 18:05:41 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Help with inconsistent network performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Help with inconsistent network performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Greg, Greg Lindahl wrote: > ethtool -a eth0 > > and it says RX/TX pause are on, doesn't that mean that the switch > supports it? No, it just means the NIC supports it. RX means that the NIC will send PAUSE packets if the host does not consume fast enough (rare) and TX means that the NIC will stop sending when receiving a PAUSE packet (more likely). It's independent of the switch flow control settings. > My dumb Netgear 24-port 1-gig switch supports hw flow control. Sounds > like things are a bit more difficult with low-end 10gigE ports. For RX hardware flow-control, you need enough buffer space to keep one full frame plus the latency on the longest wire, for every port. It is a bit more expensive to do with 10GigE, because you need faster memory and more of it. Some recent 10GigE chips use a shared SRAM buffer that is not big enough for the worst case with 9K packets: it works fine as long as a few ports are blocked, then it happily collapses and drops packets. Flow-control is not for everyone, and that's why it is often turned off by default. When a sender is paused, it will stop sending anything, including packets for different destinations. Dropping packets is expensive to recover but it keeps things moving. Patrick
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Help with inconsistent network performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Help with inconsistent network performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
