[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comThu Dec 13 11:18:24 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:28:37PM -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote: > That's the debateable point I understand, but is it being asserted that > it is NEVER going to be sensible to use OpenMP in favor of MPI or just > that it is most LIKELY going to be smarter to use one or the other? The second. And that many people have wasted time when they make a code do both. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list