[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue Dec 11 05:52:11 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:40:15PM -0500, Joe Landman wrote: > >> b) the only code that matters is your code (really, this should be >> everyone's mantra with benchmarking in general). > > Well, the problem here is that the question most people are asking is, > "how should I parallelize my code?" This question gets asked before > you know the performance on your code. > > So the mantra doesn't help. On the contrary, it is precisely because people are asking "how should I parallelize" that they need to ask the basic question of "where does my code spend time for my problems." Most people I know working on parallelization or optimization have at least asked that question. Starting parallelization without this knowledge in advance is an exercise pretty much guaranteed to fail. Unless you happen to be an extremely lucky guesser. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
