[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comMon Dec 10 22:36:03 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:40:15PM -0500, Joe Landman wrote: > b) the only code that matters is your code (really, this should be > everyone's mantra with benchmarking in general). Well, the problem here is that the question most people are asking is, "how should I parallelize my code?" This question gets asked before you know the performance on your code. So the mantra doesn't help. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
