[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eray Ozkural examachine at gmail.comSun Dec 9 15:45:25 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 9, 2007 9:37 PM, Toon Knapen <toon.knapen at gmail.com> wrote: > And considering that future processors are even going more extreme in > the Numa direction (e.g. the Intel 80-core), is'nt it more future-safe > to go with MPI if one would start a large coding-project now? > > thanks for all the reactions, I think that's a good point. For NUMA obviously MPI is more useful. Best, -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunct: http://myspace.com/malfunct ai-philosophy: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list