[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Martin Siegert siegert at sfu.caSat Dec 8 14:04:50 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:17:25PM -0800, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:55:07PM -0800, Martin Siegert wrote: > > > In short: the performance of OpenMP code isn't even close to that of the > > MPI code. > > Thanks for more concrete data, Martin, do you have a URL for some more > detailed results? I'd love to have it next time this question comes > up. I'll post a note about our benchmarking work in a few weeks (the work isn't quite finished yet) and ask for comments at that time. Nevertheless, if you know of well performing OpenMP applications I am happy to include them in our benchmark collection. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Siegert Head, Research Computing WestGrid Site Lead Academic Computing Services phone: 778 782-4691 Simon Fraser University fax: 778 782-4242 Burnaby, British Columbia email: siegert at sfu.ca Canada V5A 1S6
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
