[Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comMon Dec 3 12:55:45 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:11:51AM +0100, H?kon Bugge wrote: > But > there are cases where you cannot; a) the > "decomposition parallel efficiency" is not good > enough or b) the processes need a huge (shared) table. You can accomplish (b) using a mmaped file, which is much easier than hybrid programming. I agree that (a) is theoretically useful, but I have only once seen a benchmark situation where (a) was the case. I have seen several situations where a hybrid code had a 1D MPI decomposition and "needed" OpenMP for more scaling, but could have been a pure MPI 2D or 3D code, with less complexity than the hybrid code. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
