[Beowulf] small file systems
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comTue Aug 28 11:17:00 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small file systems
- Next message: [Beowulf] small file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg, Well that's fair of course, I should have said that 5GHz is an unachiveable upper bound for a sufficiently distributable application. If I wanted to add some huge number of integers, which can be generated by some simple formula in ranges at each node, then 10 500MHz machines generating ranges and then computing subtotals would be almost as fast as one 5GHz machine, but for any real apps we would not see such a gain. I'm sure I"m overoptimistic about the "embarassing parallelism" of my own app, but pretty much it's pretty embarassing I'm pretty sure :-) Got's to see. Peter On 8/28/07, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:28:39PM -0400, Peter St. John wrote: > > > So max thruput would be 10x 500 MHz, sorta a 5GHz computer for > > $1600, > > No, it's like 10 500 Mhz computers, and very unlike a 5 Ghz computer. > > I know some marketing types, and even the CEO of Sun, likes to add up > Ghz. But it's silly to do so. > > -- greg > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20070828/8368155a/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small file systems
- Next message: [Beowulf] small file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
